The Gap That's Costing Organisations Their Next Phase of Growth
- Chloe Davies
- 22 minutes ago
- 3 min read

Why the businesses that stay closest to reality will outperform those that simply move fastest.
Businesses have never had more data, yet many have never felt less certain about where growth will come from.
The problem isn’t a lack of information. It’s the growing distance between what organisations know and what they believe they know.
Despite unprecedented access to customer insights, market intelligence and real-time analytics, many leadership teams are finding it harder -not easier- to make confident decisions. Growth is becoming more difficult to predict, consumer expectations continue to evolve, and the assumptions that once underpinned successful businesses are becoming less reliable.
This isn’t just a feeling. According to PwC's 28th Annual Global CEO Survey, 42% of CEOs believe their organisation will not remain economically viable over the next decade without significant reinvention. Bain & Company's research on sustaining profitable growth similarly found that only one in nine companies sustain profitable growth over a prolonged period, with most barriers to growth being internal rather than external.
It’s tempting to explain this through economics, technology or disruption. While all of these play a role, I believe there is another challenge quietly emerging inside organisations.
At The Unmistakables, we call this organisational lag: the growing gap between how organisations believe the world works and how people are actually experiencing it.
Organisational lag rarely announces itself. It develops gradually, often unnoticed, as businesses continue to make decisions based on assumptions that no longer reflect reality.
In my experience, organisations rarely wake up one morning and suddenly become irrelevant. Instead, the gap widens gradually. Assumptions that once served the business become accepted as fact. Decisions are made based on what leaders believe customers, employees and communities want, rather than what they are actually telling us. Eventually, organisations find themselves responding to a world that no longer exists.
This is rarely the result of poor leadership or a lack of ambition. More often, it is a consequence of success. The systems, behaviours and ways of thinking that once created growth become embedded within the organisation. Over time, certainty replaces curiosity. Familiarity replaces learning. Confidence quietly replaces proximity to reality.
That matters because relevance isn’t simply about keeping up with culture. It is an organisational capability.
The organisations that consistently outperform are not those that chase every trend or react to every headline. They are the ones that remain intentionally connected to the people they serve. They create environments where assumptions are continually tested, different perspectives are actively sought, and decisions are informed by what is changing rather than by what has always worked.
Relevance, in this context, becomes a competitive advantage. It reduces organisational lag by helping businesses stay closer to reality than their competitors.
We saw this reflected repeatedly in conversations during Advertising Week Europe earlier this year. Across industries, leaders weren’t asking how to make marginal improvements to existing strategies. They were asking bigger questions: How do we stay relevant as expectations shift? How do we build organisations that can adapt without constantly reinventing themselves? And how do we make better decisions when certainty feels increasingly elusive?
Those conversations reinforced something we see every day in our work.
Growth doesn’t begin with having all the answers. It begins with staying close enough to reality to ask better questions.
That requires organisations to create cultures where challenge is welcomed rather than avoided, where curiosity is rewarded rather than rushed, and where leaders are prepared to revisit assumptions before the market forces them to.
Every organisation experiences organisational lag. The question isn’t whether it exists. The question is how quickly you recognise it - and what you choose to do next.
The organisations that continue to grow won’t necessarily be the ones that move fastest. They’ll be the ones that stay closest to reality.
If this article has prompted you to think differently about where your next phase of growth will come from, we’d love to explore what organisational lag might look like in your organisation and how reducing it could unlock new opportunities for growth.